Skip to main content

FRAMES logo
Resource Catalog

Document

Type: Journal Article
Author(s): Han-Sup Han; Harry W. Lee; Leonard R. Johnson
Publication Date: 2004

ANNOTATION: In order to reduce the risk of wildfire in the Interior Northwest of the United States the economic feasibility of small wood thinning and utilization is considered in this article. The major factors influencing economic feasibility were forest harvesting methods used, road accessibility and conditions, hauling distances to processing facilities and the market price of thinning materials. This article also includes a detailed discussion of tree volume and potential product recovery in (roundwood/sawlog, clean chip, biomass fuel) with respect to a variety of harvesting methods (stump-to-truck, skyline, helicopter, mechanized whole tree) and their associated economic considerations. ABSTRACT: Mechanical thinning in dense, small-diameter stands is being increasingly considered to reduce the risk of wildfire in the Interior Northwest of the United States. Economic feasibility of small wood thinning and utilization is in question due to the low market value of thinning materials and high costs for thinning and transportation. Two cost models were used to estimate thinning costs for various harvesting systems. Tree volume and potential product recovery (roundwood, clean chip, and biomass fuel) were computed and used to analyze the economic feasibility of small wood thinning and transportation in southwest Idaho. Harvesting costs for small-diameter trees increased with decrease of tree size, especially with skyline and helicopter systems. At average 10-inch diameter at breast height (DBH), skyline and helicopter stump-to-truck logging and chipping costs were about three and six times more expensive, respectively, compared with a mechanized whole-tree harvesting system that showed the lowest cost at $34.23/100 ft. A sawlog harvest only option with a mechanical whole-tree harvesting system showed a positive return ($/acre) when hauling distances were less than 53 miles. Other harvest options that included clean chip and/or biomass fuel as well as sawlogs were not financially viable, indicating that transportation of low market value materials (clean chip and biomass fuel) resulted in more cost than revenue. The factors affecting economic feasibility of small wood harvesting include forest harvesting systems used, road accessibility and conditions, hauling distance to manufacturing facilities, and market price of thinning materials.

Online Links
Citation: Han, Han-Sup; Lee, Harry W.; Johnson, Leonard R. 2004. Economic feasibility of an integrated harvesting system for small-diameter trees in southwest Idaho. Forest Products Journal 54(2):21-27.

Cataloging Information

Topics:
Economics    Fuels    Models
Regions:
Partner Sites:
Keywords:
  • cost analysis
  • economic feasibility
  • fire resistance
  • harvesting
  • Idaho
  • small diameter timber
  • thinning
Record Last Modified:
Record Maintained By: FRAMES Staff (https://www.frames.gov/contact)
FRAMES Record Number: 7605