To help trainings meet the needs of fire personnel, there must be a baseline knowledge of what smoke and air quality content is currently being conveyed. The NWCG Smoke Committee and the University of Idaho have worked to develop assessments of NWCG courses and position task books for air quality content as well as a snapshot survey of smoke and air quality training background within the IQCS system. A breif summary of report findings, as well as a link to the full reports may be found below:
This assessment reviews the occurrence of smoke and air quality information within 91courses and 125 PTBs. Smoke management context, detail, and conformity of position requirements among agencies are assessed. Of the 91 NWCG courses assessed for key words and information, 70 contained relevant key words. Of those, 19 courses contained at least 50% or more hits relevant to “smoke management and air quality”, but only 2 courses contained content that enabled a working knowledge of smoke management and air quality principles. These two courses were 'Smoke Management Techniques' and 'Prescribed Fire Plan Preparation'.
Of the 125 position task books processed through the protocol 10 were found to be significant in their intent of giving the individual insight into proper management of smoke and air quality related issues:
- Field Observer (FOBS)
- Fire Effects Monitor (FEMO)
- Fire Behavior Analyst (FBAN)
- Long Term Analyst (LTAN)
- Strategic Operational Planner (SOPL)
- Prescribed Fire Burn Boss Types 1,2 and 3 (RXB1,2 & 3)
- Prescribed Fire Managers Types 1 and 2 (RXM1 & 2)
Of these, FOBS has fairly light smoke management responsibilities, and low requirements for smoke management background. FEMOs may also come into the position with a relatively little smoke management background, as do LTANs. The position of SOPL has multiple routes by which it may be entered, some requiring more smoke management background than others. NWCG does not require smoke management training for SOPL; however it may be present for personnel in the position who arrived via a USFS Fire Use Manager or Prescribed Burn Boss position. Personnel arriving to this position via similar routes in other agencies, or via the Division Section chief may not have the same level of smoke management background, as RX-410 is not a requirement for those routes. As with SOPL, prescribed burn bosses and managers may have various levels of smoke management knowledge based on their home agency and the route through which they arrived at their current position. For example, in the case of burn bosses, NWCG does not require RX-410 for these positions, while the Forest Service does. A query of the Incident Command Qualification System to determine what positions currently have RX-410 and RX-341, will follow this report to provide finer detail into where smoke management education is dispersed throughout the current command structure.
It this assessment it is apparent that smoke management and air quality trainings are being used to a greater extent than is indicated by minimum position requirements for prescribed fire and suppression positions. Other observations are:
- There are multiple levels of smoke responsibility, where different positions require less detail, or different knowledge, than is currently conveyed in RX-341 or RX-410. For example, LTANs have smoke monitoring requirements, yet there is little smoke monitoring training in the courses. PIOs often need smoke messaging information to relay to the public but do not receive training in this area.
- Many wildfire positions have smoke management training likely acquired by their previous or current involvement in prescribed fire and fuels programs indicating a dependence of the wildfire incident management teams on the prescribed fire and fuels programs.
- Smoke from wildfires is an example where direct coordination with partners, stakeholders, and the public is needed in wildfire decisions, something that is directed in two NWCG reports; Report on Evolving Incident Management: A Recommendation for the Future (NWCG 2011) and the Guidance for Implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy (Fire Executive Council 2009). Smoke impacts can be costly and recent studies have correlated wildfire smoke impacts with dramatic increases in medical costs and mortality. Furthermore, transportation fatalities have been attributed to wildfire smoke. Currently, no training addresses this.