01:05:19	Robert Ziel:	did you think about comparing fuel treatment scenarios...shaded fuelbreaks and masticated fuelbreak regen to what you find in the wildfire regen?  fuel and fire behavior
01:05:29	Jennifer Barnes:	Has the WFDS models been calibrated or compared to fire behavior in Alaska previously?
01:06:27	Jennifer Barnes:	Does the WFDS models take Lidar inputs?
01:06:49	Randi Jandt:	How well do you think the modeling approach represents potential differences in SURFACE fuel moisture in the more open and higher insolation and potentially better-drained multi-burn sites?
01:17:58	Randi Jandt:	Another paper showing fire re-entry into burned stands (deciduous stands) in years with high fire indices:   Barrett, K., T. Loboda, A. D. McGuire, H. Genet, E. Hoy, and E. Kasischke. 2016. Static and dynamic controls on fire activity at moderate spatial and temporal scales in the Alaskan boreal forest. Ecosphere, v. 7, no. 11, p. 1572. 10.1002/ecs2.1572.
01:20:01	Katherine Hayes:	A good summary of the work linking lidar to combustion models: Rowell, E., Loudermilk, E.L., Hawley, C., Pokswinski, S., Seielstad, C., Queen, L., O'Brien, J.J., Hudak, A.T., Goodrick, S. and Hiers, J.K., 2020. Coupling terrestrial laser scanning with 3D fuel biomass sampling for advancing wildland fuels characterization. Forest Ecology and Management, 462, p.117945.
01:21:15	Lisa Saperstein:	Great presentation!
01:22:40	Jennifer Barnes:	Thanks Katherine - great work!