Wilderness perceptions versus management reality in the Adirondack Park, USA
Document Type: Journal Article
Author(s): A. M. Larkin; C. M. Beier
Publication Year: 2014

Cataloging Information

  • Adirondack Park
  • conservation easements
  • GIS
  • land management
  • New York
  • protected-area management
  • state parks
  • wilderness
  • wilderness areas
Record Maintained By:
Record Last Modified: June 1, 2018
FRAMES Record Number: 52994
Tall Timbers Record Number: 30272
TTRS Location Status: Not in file
TTRS Call Number: Available
TTRS Abstract Status: Okay, Fair use, Reproduced by permission

This bibliographic record was either created or modified by the Tall Timbers Research Station and Land Conservancy and is provided without charge to promote research and education in Fire Ecology. The E.V. Komarek Fire Ecology Database is the intellectual property of the Tall Timbers Research Station and Land Conservancy.


Wilderness perception studies provide valuable insights on the relationship between recreational or cultural experiences and natural settings. Although this approach has been little used in the management and planning of protected areas, it has potential to investigate and inform land use policy and planning that achieves a better fit among multiple user or stakeholder groups and the natural landscape. We applied the wilderness perception mapping methodology to the Adirondack Park, a six-million acre protected area in New York State (USA) that consists of mixed private and public land use classifications designed to promote wilderness character while maintaining a permanent residential population. Using a regional survey coupled with a GIS, we created spatial models of the areas perceived as wilderness by three Adirondack Park stakeholder groups in four communities: permanent residents, seasonal residents and visitors. Wilderness perception maps were then compared with current land use classifications in a spatial overlay. Roughly half of the area perceived as 'strong purist' wilderness (i.e., the most restrictive definition) overlapped with classified Wilderness lands. The remaining areas were mostly private lands managed as working forests, many under state-owned conservation easements -- indicating their potential value for wilderness recreation and amenities. Stakeholder groups differed little in the total area perceived as wilderness, but map overlays identified local patterns of agreement and disparity useful for land planning and conflict management. With further development, wilderness perception models can support an integrative approach to protected area management by considering user perceptions while also meeting legal protection mandates. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Larkin, A. M., and C. M. Beier. 2014. Wilderness perceptions versus management reality in the Adirondack Park, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 130, p. 1-13. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.003.