Skip to main content

FRAMES logo
Resource Catalog

Document

Type: Journal Article
Author(s): Adena R. Rissman; Menka Bihari; Christopher Hamilton; Christina Locke; David Lowenstein; Melissa Motew; Jessica M. Price; R. Smail
Publication Date: July 2013

Conservation organizations rely on conservation easements for diverse purposes, including protection of species and natural communities, working forests, and open space. This research investigated how perpetual conservation easements incorporated property rights, responsibilities, and options for change over time in land management. We compared 34 conservation easements held by one federal, three state, and four nonprofit organizations in Wisconsin. They incorporated six mechanisms for ongoing land management decision-making: management plans (74 %), modifications to permitted landowner uses with discretionary consent (65 %), amendment clauses (53 %), easement holder rights to conduct land management (50 %), reference to laws or policies as compliance terms (47 %), and conditional use permits (12 %). Easements with purposes to protect species and natural communities had more ecological monitoring rights, organizational control over land management, and mechanisms for change than easements with general open space purposes. Forestry purposes were associated with mechanisms for change but not necessarily with ecological monitoring rights or organizational control over land management. The Natural Resources Conservation Service-Wetland Reserve Program had a particularly consistent approach with high control over land use and some discretion to modify uses through permits. Conservation staff perceived a need to respond to changing social and ecological conditions but were divided on whether climate change was likely to negatively impact their conservation easements. Many conservation easements involved significant constraints on easement holders' options for altering land management to achieve conservation purposes over time. This study suggests the need for greater attention to easement drafting, monitoring, and ongoing decision processes to ensure the public benefits of land conservation in changing landscapes. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013.

Online Links
Citation: Rissman, A., M. Bihari, C. Hamilton, C. Locke, D. Lowenstein, M. Motew, J. Price, and R. Smail. 2013. Land management restrictions and options for change in perpetual conservation easements. Environmental Management, v. 52, no. 1, p. 277-288. 10.1007/s00267-013-0091-z.

Cataloging Information

Topics:
Regions:
Alaska    California    Eastern    Great Basin    Hawaii    Northern Rockies    Northwest    Rocky Mountain    Southern    Southwest    National
Keywords:
  • conservation easements
  • conservation easements
  • ecosystem dynamics
  • ecosystem management
  • environmental policy
  • land management
  • land trusts
  • private land conservation
  • private lands
  • working forests
Tall Timbers Record Number: 29022Location Status: Not in fileCall Number: AvailableAbstract Status: Fair use, Okay, Reproduced by permission
Record Last Modified:
Record Maintained By: FRAMES Staff (https://www.frames.gov/contact)
FRAMES Record Number: 51996

This bibliographic record was either created or modified by Tall Timbers and is provided without charge to promote research and education in Fire Ecology. The E.V. Komarek Fire Ecology Database is the intellectual property of Tall Timbers.