Document


Title

Old-growth policy
Document Type: Journal Article
Author(s): D. Vosick; D. M. Ostergren; L. Murfitt
Publication Year: 2007

Cataloging Information

Keyword(s):
  • Accipiter gentilis
  • catastrophic fires
  • conservation
  • diameter caps
  • federal employee liability
  • fire frequency
  • fire management
  • forest management
  • fuel management
  • Healthy Forests Restoration Act
  • institutional barriers
  • land management
  • liability
  • litigation
  • Mexican spotted owl
  • nongame birds
  • northern goshawk
  • old growth forests
  • preservationist philosophy
  • public education
  • Strix occidentalis
  • thinning
  • threatened and endangered species (animals)
  • wilderness areas
  • wildfires
  • wildland fire use
  • wildlife habitat management
Region(s):
Record Maintained By:
Record Last Modified: June 1, 2018
FRAMES Record Number: 46810
Tall Timbers Record Number: 22619
TTRS Location Status: Not in file
TTRS Call Number: Available
TTRS Abstract Status: Okay, Fair use, Reproduced by permission

This bibliographic record was either created or modified by the Tall Timbers Research Station and Land Conservancy and is provided without charge to promote research and education in Fire Ecology. The E.V. Komarek Fire Ecology Database is the intellectual property of the Tall Timbers Research Station and Land Conservancy.

Description

Most federal legislation and policies (e.g., the Wilderness Act, Endangered Species Act, National Forest Management Act) fail to speak directly to the need for old-growth protection, recruitment, and restoration on federal lands. Various policy and attitudinal barriers must be changed to move beyond the current situation. For example, in order to achieve the goal of healthy old growth in frequent-fire forests, the public must be educated regarding the evolutionary nature of these ecosystems and persuaded that collaborative action rather than preservation and litigation is the best course for the future of these forests. Land managers and policy makers must be encouraged to look beyond the single-species management paradigm toward managing natural processes, such as fire, so that ecosystems fall within the natural range of variability. They must also see that, given their recent evidence of catastrophic fires, management must take place outside the wildland-urban interface in order to protect old-growth forest attributes and human infrastructure. This means that, in some wilderness areas, management may be required. Land managers, researchers, and policy makers will also have to agree on a definition of old growth in frequent-fire landscapes; simply adopting a definition from the mesic Pacific Northwest will not work. Moreover, the culture within the federal agencies needs revamping to allow for more innovation, especially in terms of tree thinning and wildland fire use. Funding for comprehensive restoration treatments needs to be increased, and monitoring of the Healthy Forest Initiative and Healthy Forest Restoration Act must be undertaken. © 2007 by the authors. Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance.

Online Link(s):
Citation:
Vosick, D., D. M. Ostergren, and L. Murfitt. 2007. Old-growth policy. Ecology and Society, v. 12, no. 2, p. 19-14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art19/.