Fuel reduction has the best chance of success if managers understand the factors that influence public acceptance of fuel management sufficiently to provide effective responses to the questions, objections, and concerns of wildland-urban interface (WUI) homeowners. This study's overall objective is to provide land managers with a standardized decision support tool that enables them to assess public acceptance and understanding of fuel treatments in areas where they are needed. The three fuel treatment approaches considered were prescribed burning, mechanical treatment, and defensible space ordinances. Specific objectives include: 1. Identify the issues related to fuel management that are salient to residents of fire-prone wildland-urban interface areas. 2. Develop and test a model of the causal factors and processes by which individuals evaluate the acceptability of a fuel management policy or plan. 3. Develop a standardized survey method for use by land managers to increase public participation in decision making, monitor public acceptance of fuel management approaches, and develop effective communication and outreach strategies. Included in Appendix B of this document is the following document: Demographic and geographic approaches to predicting public acceptance of fuel management at the wildland-urban interface: summary results from a survey of wildland-urban interface residents in California, Florida; and Michigan. This Appendix provides tabular results of the surveys given.