Document


Title

On the economics of timber damage appraisal for public forests
Document Type: Journal Article
Author(s): T. C. Brown; R. S. Boster
Publication Year: 1978

Cataloging Information

Keyword(s):
  • age classes
  • biomass
  • fire injuries (plants)
  • fire suppression
  • forest management
  • forest products
  • logging
  • multiple resource management
  • national forests
  • plant growth
  • recreation
  • state forests
  • wildlife habitat management
  • wood
Record Maintained By:
Record Last Modified: June 1, 2018
FRAMES Record Number: 32976
Tall Timbers Record Number: 7091
TTRS Location Status: In-file
TTRS Call Number: Journals-J
TTRS Abstract Status: Okay, Fair use, Reproduced by permission

This bibliographic record was either created or modified by the Tall Timbers Research Station and Land Conservancy and is provided without charge to promote research and education in Fire Ecology. The E.V. Komarek Fire Ecology Database is the intellectual property of the Tall Timbers Research Station and Land Conservancy.

Description

Damage appraisal is the basis for fire-suppression decisions. Where timber is managed for production of maximum site rent, appraisal is a rather straightforward matter of applying standard financial criteria in a 'with and without' procedure. Where the aim is maximum mean annual increment, as it often is on public forests, this procedure may yield seemingly incongruous results: if the goals and constraints guiding management allow prorating a loss by substituting one part of the inventory for another, the value of the damage may be less than the value of the specific resource in the absence of any damage. This is a consequence of maximizing wood rather than value. Ignoring 'with and without' in public decisionmaking may result in overexpenditure for fire suppression.© Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD. Abstract reproduced by permission.

Online Link(s):
Citation:
Brown, T. C., and R. S. Boster. 1978. On the economics of timber damage appraisal for public forests. Journal of Forestry, v. 76, no. 12, p. 777-780.