JFSP goals can be achieved only if the resulting scientific information is effectively transferred to the users. Recognizing that science delivery approaches are often developed on an ad hoc basis without an overall understanding of the research application process, AFP 2 004-4, Task 2 seeks proposals that 'describe, compare, contrast, and evaluate the effrctiveness of various processes used to disseminate information.., and increase the likelihood of management application of science.' Using a multi-method research approach, we will combine the strengths of qualitative and quantitative research to identify underlying mechanisms that can be used to describe, contrast, and evaluate the effectiveness of science delivery processes for different target management audiences. Specifically, we will use knowledge from a variety of social science disciplines, including communication studies, organization and knowledge management theory, decision theory, and social psychology to: 1) improve understanding of the mechanisms that influence when agency fire managers adopt and use scientific knowledge, 2) identify barriers to the effective communication and application of science, and 3) provide suggestions that increase the effectiveness and efficiency of science delivery efforts. We will develop recommendations to help applied fire researchers, research application specialists, and upper- level managers prioritize limited science application resources and increase the likelihood that science delivery efforts result in application. More effective science delivery will lead to faster integration of relevant science by management communities, and it will increase agency credibility by improving the that managers have access to the best available science.